Supported by
Jurors End Sixth Day of Deliberations in Elizabeth Holmes Trial
Ms. Holmes, the founder of the blood testing start-up Theranos, is accused of deceiving investors, patients and advertisers.
SAN JOSE, Calif. — Jurors ended a sixth day of deliberations without a verdict on Wednesday in the trial of Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of the blood testing start-up Theranos.
Ms. Holmes, 37, faces two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and nine counts of wire fraud on allegations that she deceived investors, patients and advertisers in search of money and fame. If convicted, she faces 20 years in prison for each count of wire fraud.
Deliberations were scheduled to resume on Monday morning in federal court in San Jose, Calif.
The jury of eight men and four women has deliberated for six full days. In that time, they have asked only two questions of the court.
On Dec. 21, they asked if they could take jury instructions home. (The answer was no.)
Two days later, they also asked to listen to audio exhibits of Ms. Holmes talking with investors. In the call, she said she had built Theranos “partnerships with the pharmaceutical companies and our contracts with the military,” even though pharmaceutical companies recommended against Theranos’s technology and its devices were never deployed on the battlefield.
Who’s Who in the Elizabeth Holmes Trial
Who’s Who in the Elizabeth Holmes Trial
Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced founder of the blood testing start-up Theranos, was found guilty of four of 11 charges of fraud.
Here are some key figures in the case →
The jury offered no indication this week of where it is in the deliberation process.
During the nearly four-month trial, the jurors heard from 32 witnesses, including the defendant herself. It all comes down to Ms. Holmes’s intent: Did she mean to defraud investors, patients, advertisers and others in her pursuit of investments and business for Theranos, or was she acting in good faith?
Prosecutors called 29 witnesses — including lab employees, doctors, patients, investors and commercial executives — in their attempt to paint Ms. Holmes as an example of the worst excesses of Silicon Valley’s “fake it until you make it” start-up culture.
Ms. Holmes raised nearly $1 billion from investors and signed contracts with Walgreens and Safeway based on promises of cheaper, easier blood testing. But as The Wall Street Journal revealed in 2015, Theranos’s own devices could perform only 12 tests. The company officially shut down three years later.
“She chose fraud over business failure,” Jeff Schenk, an assistant U.S. attorney, said during closing arguments.
Ms. Holmes testified that she had been a well-meaning entrepreneur who believed her own statements and trusted her scientists’ positive feedback about Theranos’s technology. She also accused Ramesh Balwani, her ex-boyfriend and Theranos’s chief operating officer, of abusing her, accusations he has denied.
“He impacted everything about who I was, and I don’t fully understand that,” she said.
Erin Woo is a reporting fellow on the technology desk. She graduated from Stanford University. More about Erin Woo
Explore Our Business Coverage
Dive deeper into the people, issues and trends shaping the world of business.
A Billionaire Online Warrior: Bill Ackman, an obstinate hedge-funder who loves a public crusade, has used X to push himself into a new realm of celebrity.
Cancel Smartphones: The N.Y.U. professor Jonathan Haidt became a favorite in Silicon Valley for his work on what he called the “coddling” of young people. Now, he has an idea for fixing Gen Z.
Landline Pride: Traditional phones may seem like relics in the iPhone era, but a recent AT&T cellular service outage had some landline lovers extolling their virtues.
C.E.O. Dreams: Fresh business school graduates are raising “search funds” from willing investors to buy companies they can lead.
Nelson Peltz Wants Respect: The longtime corporate agitator feels misunderstood. Maybe his fight with Disney could change that.
The Palm Oil Supply Chain: An E.U. ban on imports linked to deforestation has been hailed as a “gold standard” in climate policy. Southeast Asian countries say it threatens livelihoods.
Advertisement